Because of redistricting laws in Ohio, voters weren’t really choosing their representatives. The representatives are choosing their voters.

 

The current system encourages partisan gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is a controversial form of redistricting in which electoral district boundaries are manipulated for an unnatural electoral advantage, usually in the favor of incumbents or a specific political party. Gerrymandering is time honored. Eldridge Gerry, the governor of Massachusetts, used it in 1810 when he drew a district resembling a salamander. Today, computer technology and an increase in voters who identify with a particular party have made it much easier to exactly draw lines to achieve goals.

 

As a result, gerrymandering in Ohio has produced a Congressional delegation, and a State Senate and House of Representatives that are not representative of the political make-up of Ohio citizens. It has made it very difficult for opponents to unseat incumbents. And it has had a negative effect on voter turnout.

Ohio has long been a “battleground state” because its citizens divide themselves fairly evenly between Republicans and Democrats. In 2004 and 2000, Ohio’s electoral votes in the presidential election went to the Republican candidate (by just two percentage points in 2004). In 1996 and 1992, our electoral votes went to the Democratic candidate.  In 2002 all state wide non-judicial races were won by Republicans.  In 2006 all statewide non-judicial races were won by Democrats except for the position of Audutor.

 

However, because Republicans were in charge of drawing districts in 2001, Ohio’s elected representatives are nowhere near 50/50.  Beginning in 2005: 

Beginning in 2007, despite voters selecting Democrats for all but one non-judicial statewide elected office: 

• 61% of Ohio’s Congressional delegation is Republican
• 64% of Ohio’s Senate members are Republican
• 54% of Ohio’s House members are Republican 

Gerrymandering also makes it difficult for opposition to unseat the incumbent. As has been the case nationwide, partisan gerrymandering has severely reduced the number of competitive seats in Ohio. The election held in 2004 produced no turnover in Congressional seats, and very little turnover in party affiliation in the Ohio General Assembly, despite the impact of term limits.

 

In our 18 races for Congressional seats:

Of the 16 races for Ohio Senate seats in 2004:

In the 99 races for Ohio House seats:

The lack of contested and competitive districts has contributed to a decreasing voter turnout in Ohio. In 2002, only 47.1% of the 7,113,826 registered voters actually voted even though every Congressional representative, half of the Ohio Senators, and every House Representative was on the ballot.

 

Voters apparently didn’t think it mattered.

 

But in 2004, when Ohio was a hotly contested state in the presidential election, about 10% more voters were registered – 7,972,826 – and 71.7% of them voted.

 

By reforming redistricting laws, we can give voters a chance to elect representatives who actually represent them, and we can give voters a reason to become engaged with their governments once more.